For about a year now I've been teaching
the Piano Pedagogy course at Boston Conservatory, a requirement for
undergraduate pianists. It's been a learning experience for me, as I
never actually took a course on the subject – my own abilities as a
teacher have been formed by experience and by seeing the examples of
many wonderful teachers who taught me.
But one of the particular challenges as
I think about helping conservatory students become better teachers is
that most of their future students are likely to be less gifted and
ambitious than they are. Only the most interested and talented
students end up attending music school for college or graduate
school, but many of these will end up spending at least some portion
of their careers teaching students who may not even want to be there.
They may have parents who drag them kicking and screaming to their lessons, or (if their
teachers are lucky) they may want to play the piano but will not be willing to put in the work required (I can relate to this myself – I
don't always WANT to put in the work needed, but I have learned
through experience that hard work makes me play better, obviously).
A further challenge to the future
incomes of these students (who, by the way, are spending quite a lot
on tuition!) is that piano lessons are not something every kid (or
parent) is interested in, and I would guess that the numbers have
decreased over the past 10 or 20 years (though I don't know for
sure). There is certainly no doubt that funding for music education
in schools is lower than it once was. The debate over funding for
arts education is constant, and it has led to a variety of studies
attempting to show the benefits of music, for example, beyond the
attainment of skill at an instrument or the increased appreciation
for Beethoven Quartets. Recently, my Facebook friends have been
gleefully sharing this article
http://www.artsjournal.com/slippeddisc/2013/10/nobel-medicine-winner-says-i-owe-is-all-to-my-bassoon-teacher.html
about the recent Nobel Prize winner (in medicine), Thomas Sudhof, who
credits his bassoon teacher with teaching him his most valued skills
(work ethic and listening).
I would certainly concur that childhood
music lessons teach much more than music (though that it in and of
itself is valuable and enjoyable of course). What I don't know is how
much is specific to music lessons and how much is gained by the
mastery (or the process of mastering) any skill. My daughter, for
example, spends about 2 hours a day, 6 days a week, at the ice rink,
and I'm proud of her accomplishments. But while it would of course be
an amazing (and unlikely) achievement one day to go to the Olympics,
the real benefit of all those hours (and all those thousands of
dollars spent on coaches) is that she is learning to be disciplined,
to perform in public, to cope with nerves and disappointment, to have
courage (it's pretty scary doing a double lutz), and of course it's
also good physical exercise. Some of these same skills or personal
qualities might be developed in music lessons. And these life skills
are clearly beneficial in many fields, as the Nobel Prize winner
Sudhof said. On the other hand, more time spent on music means less
time spent on, say, computer programming, or some other potentially
useful skill.
Another article making the rounds on
Facebook is on a familiar subject: what kind of qualities or
activities separate the great achievers from the rest of the world?
This particular article uses high achievers in distinct fields
(Mozart and Kobe Bryant) to illustrate some key elements of success:
http://lifehacker.com/what-mozart-and-kobe-bryant-can-teach-us-about-delibera-1442488267
The two main points are that when we practice, it will take time (10
years, in fact) before we achieve greatness, and that our practice
needs to be with a specific purpose (something I've been telling
students for years). Mozart is cited as an example of the first
point, and Kobe Bryant as an example of the second.
Do articles like these help to persuade
parents to sign their kids up for music lessons? I think there are
some who look at kids' extracurricular activities as a stepping stone
to college admissions. There are many kids who diligently practice an
instrument only to stop the moment they arrive at Harvard. The number
of adults in community orchestras clearly is much smaller than the
number of kids in youth orchestras. Is this because they don't have
the time? (That is certainly possible! But many kids in youth
orchestras get there only because their parents act as full time
chauffeurs and secretaries). Is it because they now hate music? (That
doesn't seem likely – I assume their appreciation for music would
be greater). Are there a lack of community orchestras for them to
join? (Possibly, depending on the community where they live).
I think that aside from the time issue
(which can be real – some adults work multiple jobs, and/or have
children to care for, etc), I think adults simply don't value their
own “extracurricular” time as much as their kids'. That is, they
might set aside many hours (and dollars) to take their kids to take
music lessons, but they themselves think “it's too late for me.”
When it comes to sports, I can see this line of thinking – a 40
year old might hesitate to start learning to ski for fear of injury,
whereas a 10 year old can heal quickly. And in music it is true that
an adult learner will never be able to achieve what a 15 year old who
started at age 5 can do. But I think many are enrolling their kids
for “extra-musical” reasons (get in to college, develop a work
ethic, learn an appreciation for culture) that isn't necessary any
more for an adult (or so they think).
I have to express admiration for those
adults who do see that education (musical or otherwise) can and
should continue throughout our lives. I have an adult piano student
who is 74 years old. I know some skating parents who take lessons
once or twice a week (I took an adult class for a few months years
ago, but it doesn't fit in my schedule any more), amazed to see how
much braver their kids are on the ice than they are. My mother, when
she was in her 60's, took the same introductory computer course two
or three times in an attempt (not altogether successful) to be more
comfortable with word processing and other basic computer skills.
Many years ago, as a college freshman,
I was in New York rehearsing with a violinist friend in the home of
the great pianist Ilana Vered. I was giving some musical advice to my
friend when Ilana walked in the room and said “you should give the
same advice to yourself.” Many of us devoted parents who take our
children's mental, physical, emotional, and spiritual development
very seriously might think about being good “parents” to our own
selves.
1 comment:
Very Nice!! If you want to learn about 5 benefical tips for adult music students. You should go for it Now 5 Practice Tips for Adult Music Students
Post a Comment